CLINICAL_TRIALS ClinicalTrials.gov record update

A Comparative Study Between Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia in Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopes and the Conventional General Anesthesia With One Lung Ventilation

This page presents selected fields from the linked source record. It does not add a medical interpretation.

Record identity and dates

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov
Source record ID: NCT05077111
Title field or adapter rule: protocolSection.identificationModule.officialTitle
Ingested At: 2026-04-28T10:38:26.978031+00:00
Published At: 2021-10-14T00:00:00+00:00
Record Updated At: 2021-10-14
Timestamp Basis: source retrieval time was not retained by the feed adapter
Date limitation: source retrieval time was not retained by the feed adapter

protocolSection.conditionsModule.conditions: ["Pleural Effusion, Malignant", "Pleural Mesothelioma", "Pleural Empyema", "Pulmonary Diseases or Conditions", "Pleural Neoplasms", "Pulmonary Atelectasis", "Pleural Diseases", "Pericardial Effusion", "Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy", "Pneumothorax and Air Leak", "Hemothorax", "Pyopneumothorax"]
protocolSection.statusModule.lastUpdatePostDateStruct.date: "2021-10-14"
protocolSection.identificationModule.nctId: "NCT05077111"
protocolSection.identificationModule.officialTitle: "A Comparative Study Between Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia in Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopes and the Conventional General Anesthesia With One Lung Ventilation"
protocolSection.statusModule.overallStatus: "UNKNOWN"
protocolSection.designModule.phases: ["PHASE4"]
protocolSection.statusModule.resultsFirstPostDateStruct.date: ""

Intervention details are not present in the imported fields for this record. No drug-condition relationship is inferred from co-listing.

This index keeps the source fields it imported; it may not contain the complete original record. Verify wording and context in the linked source.