Catalyst Wire Dossier Catalyst Wire Dossier
CLINICAL_TRIALS ClinicalTrials.gov record update

Comparison of Two Analgesic Pretreatment Techniques (2% Lidocaine Infiltration vs. EMLA Cream Application) Before Spinal Needle Insertion for Pain Reduction and Maternal Satisfaction Level Assessment in Women Undergoing LSCS. A Prospective Randomized Control Trial

This page presents selected fields from the linked source record. It does not add a medical interpretation.

Open original source record ↗

Record identity and dates

Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Source record ID
NCT04050059
Title field or adapter rule
protocolSection.identificationModule.officialTitle
Ingested At
2026-04-28T10:37:45.256228+00:00
Published At
2020-04-08T00:00:00+00:00
Record Updated At
2020-04-08
Timestamp Basis
source retrieval time was not retained by the feed adapter
Date limitation
source retrieval time was not retained by the feed adapter

Fields recorded by this source

protocolSection.conditionsModule.conditions
["Anesthesia, Spinal", "Pain", "Pregnancy", "Cesarean Section"]
protocolSection.statusModule.lastUpdatePostDateStruct.date
"2020-04-08"
protocolSection.identificationModule.nctId
"NCT04050059"
protocolSection.identificationModule.officialTitle
"Comparison of Two Analgesic Pretreatment Techniques (2% Lidocaine Infiltration vs. EMLA Cream Application) Before Spinal Needle Insertion for Pain Reduction and Maternal Satisfaction Level Assessment in Women Undergoing LSCS. A Prospective Randomized Control Trial"
protocolSection.statusModule.overallStatus
"COMPLETED"
protocolSection.designModule.phases
["NA"]
protocolSection.statusModule.resultsFirstPostDateStruct.date
""

Study condition terms

  • Anesthesia, Spinal (protocolSection.conditionsModule.conditions)
  • Pain (protocolSection.conditionsModule.conditions)
  • Pregnancy (protocolSection.conditionsModule.conditions)
  • Cesarean Section (protocolSection.conditionsModule.conditions)

Intervention details are not present in the imported fields for this record. No drug-condition relationship is inferred from co-listing.

This index keeps the source fields it imported; it may not contain the complete original record. Verify wording and context in the linked source.