Lacrimal Dilator-Facilitated Incisionless Vs. Standard Sub-Tenon's Block: A Randomized, Prospective and Non-inferiority Comparative Study

This page presents selected fields from the linked source record. It does not add a medical interpretation.

Open original source record ↗

Record identity and dates

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Source record ID

NCT04345172

Title field or adapter rule

protocolSection.identificationModule.officialTitle

Ingested At

2026-04-28T10:37:45.229286+00:00

Published At

2020-04-14T00:00:00+00:00

Record Updated At

2020-04-14

Timestamp Basis

source retrieval time was not retained by the feed adapter

Date limitation

source retrieval time was not retained by the feed adapter

Fields recorded by this source

protocolSection.conditionsModule.conditions

["to Compare Lacrimal Dilator-facilitated Incisionless and Standard STB With Wescott Scissors"]

protocolSection.statusModule.lastUpdatePostDateStruct.date

"2020-04-14"

protocolSection.identificationModule.nctId

"NCT04345172"

protocolSection.identificationModule.officialTitle

"Lacrimal Dilator-Facilitated Incisionless Vs. Standard Sub-Tenon\u0027s Block: A Randomized, Prospective and Non-inferiority Comparative Study"

protocolSection.statusModule.overallStatus

"COMPLETED"

protocolSection.designModule.phases

["NA"]

protocolSection.statusModule.resultsFirstPostDateStruct.date

""

Study condition terms

• to Compare Lacrimal Dilator-facilitated Incisionless and Standard STB With Wescott Scissors (protocolSection.conditionsModule.conditions)

Intervention details are not present in the imported fields for this record. No drug-condition relationship is inferred from co-listing.

This index keeps the source fields it imported; it may not contain the complete original record. Verify wording and context in the linked source.