CLINICAL_TRIALS ClinicalTrials.gov record update

Is Lidocaine Really Guilty? A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Comparison of the Incidence of TNS After Intrathecal Lidocaine Administration vs. Intrathecal Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia

This page presents selected fields from the linked source record. It does not add a medical interpretation.

Record identity and dates

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov
Source record ID: NCT03862287
Title field or adapter rule: protocolSection.identificationModule.officialTitle
Ingested At: 2026-04-28T10:37:23.209877+00:00
Published At: 2019-03-05T00:00:00+00:00
Record Updated At: 2019-03-05
Timestamp Basis: source retrieval time was not retained by the feed adapter
Date limitation: source retrieval time was not retained by the feed adapter

protocolSection.conditionsModule.conditions: ["Orthopedic Disorder", "Leg Injuries"]
protocolSection.statusModule.lastUpdatePostDateStruct.date: "2019-03-05"
protocolSection.identificationModule.nctId: "NCT03862287"
protocolSection.identificationModule.officialTitle: "Is Lidocaine Really Guilty? A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Comparison of the Incidence of TNS After Intrathecal Lidocaine Administration vs. Intrathecal Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia"
protocolSection.statusModule.overallStatus: "UNKNOWN"
protocolSection.designModule.phases: ["NA"]
protocolSection.statusModule.resultsFirstPostDateStruct.date: ""

Intervention details are not present in the imported fields for this record. No drug-condition relationship is inferred from co-listing.

This index keeps the source fields it imported; it may not contain the complete original record. Verify wording and context in the linked source.