CLINICAL_TRIALS ClinicalTrials.gov record update

A Prospective Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Bolus-dose Lusedra (Fospropofol Disodium) 6.5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg Versus a Placebo (With Midazolam Rescue) for Minimal-to-moderate Sedation in Patients Undergoing Procedural Sedation for Regional Anesthesia Blocks Prior to Orthopedic Surgery

This page presents selected fields from the linked source record. It does not add a medical interpretation.

Record identity and dates

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov
Source record ID: NCT01195103
Title field or adapter rule: protocolSection.identificationModule.officialTitle
Ingested At: 2026-04-28T10:35:18.346343+00:00
Published At: 2012-03-29T00:00:00+00:00
Record Updated At: 2012-06-29
Results Posted At: 2012-03-29
Timestamp Basis: source retrieval time was not retained by the feed adapter
Date limitation: source retrieval time was not retained by the feed adapter

protocolSection.conditionsModule.conditions: ["Procedural Sedation", "Regional Anesthesia Block", "Orthopedic Surgery"]
protocolSection.statusModule.lastUpdatePostDateStruct.date: "2012-06-29"
protocolSection.identificationModule.nctId: "NCT01195103"
protocolSection.identificationModule.officialTitle: "A Prospective Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Bolus-dose Lusedra (Fospropofol Disodium) 6.5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg Versus a Placebo (With Midazolam Rescue) for Minimal-to-moderate Sedation in Patients Undergoing Procedural Sedation for Regional Anesthesia Blocks Prior to Orthopedic Surgery"
protocolSection.statusModule.overallStatus: "TERMINATED"
protocolSection.designModule.phases: ["PHASE4"]
protocolSection.statusModule.resultsFirstPostDateStruct.date: "2012-03-29"

Intervention details are not present in the imported fields for this record. No drug-condition relationship is inferred from co-listing.

This index keeps the source fields it imported; it may not contain the complete original record. Verify wording and context in the linked source.