CLINICAL_TRIALS ClinicalTrials.gov record update

Progrip Versus ProFlor: Two Fixation Free Devices for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial: The ProPro Study

This page presents selected fields from the linked source record. It does not add a medical interpretation.

Record identity and dates

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov
Source record ID: NCT06556498
Title field or adapter rule: protocolSection.identificationModule.officialTitle
Ingested At: 2026-04-25T22:26:16.939105+00:00
Published At: 2024-08-16T00:00:00+00:00
Record Updated At: 2024-08-16
Timestamp Basis: source retrieval time was not retained by the feed adapter
Date limitation: source retrieval time was not retained by the feed adapter

protocolSection.conditionsModule.conditions: ["Hernia, Inguinal", "Laparoscopic Surgery"]
protocolSection.statusModule.lastUpdatePostDateStruct.date: "2024-08-16"
protocolSection.identificationModule.nctId: "NCT06556498"
protocolSection.identificationModule.officialTitle: "Progrip Versus ProFlor: Two Fixation Free Devices for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial: The ProPro Study"
protocolSection.statusModule.overallStatus: "ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION"
protocolSection.designModule.phases: ["PHASE4"]
protocolSection.statusModule.resultsFirstPostDateStruct.date: ""

Intervention details are not present in the imported fields for this record. No drug-condition relationship is inferred from co-listing.

This index keeps the source fields it imported; it may not contain the complete original record. Verify wording and context in the linked source.