Catalyst Wire Dossier Catalyst Wire Dossier
CLINICAL_TRIALS ClinicalTrials.gov record update

Comparison of the Bilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Versus Curare in Muscle Relaxation of the Abdominal Wall During Laparoscopic Digestive Surgery: Prospective Randomized Study

This page presents selected fields from the linked source record. It does not add a medical interpretation.

Open original source record ↗

Record identity and dates

Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Source record ID
NCT01628952
Title field or adapter rule
protocolSection.identificationModule.officialTitle
Ingested At
2026-04-25T22:28:57.388163+00:00
Published At
2025-11-19T00:00:00+00:00
Record Updated At
2025-11-19
Timestamp Basis
source retrieval time was not retained by the feed adapter
Date limitation
source retrieval time was not retained by the feed adapter

Fields recorded by this source

protocolSection.conditionsModule.conditions
["The Main of This Study is to Compare the Nerve Block of the Muscles of the Abdominal Wall Between the Bilateral TAP Block and Curare"]
protocolSection.statusModule.lastUpdatePostDateStruct.date
"2025-11-19"
protocolSection.identificationModule.nctId
"NCT01628952"
protocolSection.identificationModule.officialTitle
"Comparison of the Bilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Versus Curare in Muscle Relaxation of the Abdominal Wall During Laparoscopic Digestive Surgery: Prospective Randomized Study"
protocolSection.statusModule.overallStatus
"COMPLETED"
protocolSection.designModule.phases
["PHASE4"]
protocolSection.statusModule.resultsFirstPostDateStruct.date
""

Study condition terms

  • The Main of This Study is to Compare the Nerve Block of the Muscles of the Abdominal Wall Between the Bilateral TAP Block and Curare (protocolSection.conditionsModule.conditions)

Intervention details are not present in the imported fields for this record. No drug-condition relationship is inferred from co-listing.

This index keeps the source fields it imported; it may not contain the complete original record. Verify wording and context in the linked source.